open source · MIT★ star it on GitHubfound a bug, or want an agent supported?open an issuebuilt in the open, receipts included
skip to content
tokenchitv0.12.0 · MIT

The board

opt-in

Everyone who ran tokenchit publish, or a bare tokenchit generate, which ends by calling it. A usage count over the selected window, not a skill score.

Get your own card →
  1. 1@Rupam-M3w139B$64,573
  2. 2@VinayakRai541.5B$5,123
  3. 3@bucharitesh6w19.6B$5,709
developers
18
tokens
248B
equiv. cost
$87,749
verified
18 of 18

GitHub sign-in proves the handleself-reported, handle unprovedNeither audits the figures — see the notes below the table.

Developers on the board, ranked by tokens
rankdeveloperagent mixlast 30dtokensequiv. coststreak
1–@Rupam-M✓3w139B$64,5730d
2–@VinayakRai5✓41.5B$5,1230d
3–@bucharitesh✓6w—19.6B$5,7090d
4▲2@veerLakshya✓17.3B$3620d
5▼1@manishreddy123✓9.84B$4,5410d
6▼1@iyashjayesh✓7.09B$350d
7–@Parth080✓5.70B$4,6695d
8–@NVJKKartik✓6w—2.26B$5050d
9–@crazyparadox✓4w—1.61B$3650d
10–@MridulaSivanandan✓6w—1.39B$6870d
11–@praveenMalagudi✓4w—1.14B$8630d
12–@AryanTN05✓1.03B$1350d
13–@dumbprism19✓3w—157M$690d
14–@ashfaqjani916✓3w—151M$200d
15–@nevillejs✓6w—100M$560d
16–@adityarawat007✓5w—56.9M$280d
17–@akshattrivedi-flam✓6w—31.5M$100d
18–@prnvyellayi✓—13.5K$00d
  • codex

How this is ranked

Verified rows first, then tokens over the selected window. Signing in is the only thing that ties a row to a GitHub account, so it is the only thing that can carry a position — an unverified row still appears with its figures, it just cannot outrank a verified one. Every column covers the same window as the rank.

A cli badge means the numbers were self-reported without a GitHub sign-in; those rows stay on the board rather than being hidden, because a visible unverified row is more honest than a quietly filtered one. Streak is the current run of active days, which is not a windowed figure. Submissions far outside the range of real usage are held for review and do not appear until a person has looked. Figures are self-reported and bounded for plausibility, not audited.