open source · MIT★ star it on GitHubfound a bug, or want an agent supported?open an issuebuilt in the open, receipts included
skip to content
tokenchitv0.7.0 · MIT

@aarsh-nanonets

✓ github verified

First activity 2026-08-10. synced 3d ago. Figures are self-reported by the tokenchit CLI from local agent logs.

tokens
6.99B
equiv. cost
$4,621
streak
0d
active days
24

Activity · last 90 days

6.99B tokens across 24 active dayslessmore

Agents

  • claude-code6.99B100.0%

Models lifetime

Models used, with tokens and equivalent cost
modeltokensequiv. cost
claude-opus-56.75B$4,306.83
claude-opus-4-81.11B$799.57
claude-fable-5384M$530.37
claude-sonnet-522.6M$9.99

The card

@aarsh-nanonetsTOKENS6.99BEQUIV. COST$4,621STREAK0dclaude-code 100%TOKENCHIT.APPSYNCED 3D AGO
markdown
[![tokenchit — @aarsh-nanonets AI coding agent usage](https://tokenchit.app/api/card/aarsh-nanonets.svg)](https://tokenchit.app/u/aarsh-nanonets)

This renders live from the endpoint. To commit the file instead — no request to us at all — run tokenchit sync and add the SVG to your repo.

Equiv. cost is not what they paid. It is what these tokens would cost at list API rates; most agent usage runs under a subscription where no per-token charge happens. Models with no public price are counted in the token total and left out of the cost.

Who is burning the most?

Ranked by tokens, from developers who chose to publish. The two windows disagree on purpose — one rewards the last month, the other the whole history.

Last 30 days

All time

Top 8 of each. A means the GitHub identity was proved; everything else is self-reported.

See the full board →
@aarsh-nanonets · tokenchit